Rabu, 01 Juni 2011

ugly babies faces

ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces
  • ugly babies faces



  • koruki
    Mar 22, 10:53 PM
    It's for people who are SERIOUS about music and would never listen to anything less then lossless (whenever possible).

    There are people who are serious about music and there are audiophiles. I have my share of high end headphones and amps. In saying that I'd never take anything away from someone who just enjoys the sound of music instead of checking to see if they can hear the air between two strings from a guitar in a track :)





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces.
  • ugly babies faces.



  • berkleeboy210
    Sep 1, 12:03 PM
    just checked the apple store... currently 1-2 business day shipping time for the iMac.

    this could mean updates on 9/5.....

    MBP's still ship w/ in 24hrs though.





    ugly babies faces. Sorry, Your Baby Is Ugly:
  • Sorry, Your Baby Is Ugly:



  • kevingaffney
    Sep 14, 11:10 AM
    Does the iPhone have an inherent design issue with regards to antenna performance. The answer is, absolutely YES. Does the bumper mitigate this issue, in my experience it does, however only a marginal amount.

    I have dropped calls every day, in places where I would have near full signal if I was not holding the phone. I have 3G data issues, especially in the fringe areas where I did not have an issue with my 3Gs.

    The iPhone is a great device and I agree that consumer reports is splitting hairs with the antenna issue.

    Apple agree's there is a problem or they would not have given away bumpers to everyone.

    Fortunately, I use my iPhone as a phone only about 20% of the time, so 80% of my use is great. The other 20% is only a problem about 1 in 7 calls.

    So, while it is a little inconvenient when a call drops when I hold the phone in that way, or short data interruptions on 3G from time-to-time, overall I get a lot done with the iPhone.

    I do look forward to changing my iPhone to a newer device at the first reasonable opportunity, primarily because of the antenna issue.
    I would agree completely. Have to say I use mine all day for business use. Hardly ever drop a call and it's way the best of all the iPhones I've had so far going back to 2nd gen





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. fat ugly
  • ugly babies faces. fat ugly



  • abhimat.gautam
    Mar 31, 12:04 AM
    Urgh, new iCal really is horrible.

    Does the realistic texture show up only in full screen mode, or is it that way all the time? In a window, I think it might be distracting, but in full screen, I don't think I would mind it.





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly
  • ugly babies faces. ugly



  • rezenclowd3
    Nov 24, 04:50 PM
    Gran Turismo 5: Collector's Edition (PSN: copenmind, if you wanna race :D ).

    I am just bummed that the game part of it blows. Of course the sim part is pretty damn good. Damage....eh...blows. AI....blows. Still, its all about the online for me. I'll hit you up for some online play. I don't remember my PSN identity atm...





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly
  • ugly babies faces. ugly



  • daneoni
    Nov 25, 12:03 AM
    Couldn't care less about the movie to be honest, but to avoid being nagged as anti-social(i am)...





    ugly babies faces. Most of the time, when a aby
  • Most of the time, when a aby



  • ChazUK
    Apr 3, 04:26 AM
    Contrast that ad to this...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxZ6NQnIPkU

    ... and the message Apple is sending becomes very clear.

    Isn't that a Verizon ad, not a Mototrola one?

    People keep whining about the "Droid" commercials but that is Verizon's branding and line and has nothing to do with the manufacturers. Look at this Droid Incredible commercial by HTC (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNz1qfJc9z4U) (this one too (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZkcODD6Zaw)) and then see what Verizon (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwzKFDkb0MI) did to it.





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly babies
  • ugly babies faces. ugly babies



  • Doctor Q
    Jul 18, 02:27 PM
    Supposedly Mr. Jobs "lost" this round of negotiations...I wouldn't be surprised if he ceded that point to the studios because he knows something is around the corner. One possibility that jumps to mind is competition between studios to be the first to provide pay-to-own content.In the meantime, Movielink already offers rental and purchase options, and I read that they will also be allowing you to burn your own DVDs, although I don't know the details.

    This is from their site:





    ugly babies faces. Just another cute, ugly baby.
  • Just another cute, ugly baby.



  • Aeroflux
    Mar 28, 03:53 PM
    I stopped reading at "silky smooth 30fps". What the hell? Is this "silky smooth" for a timely epileptic? Talk about hype. I'm looking forward to the NGP more than anything else for portable gaming. I've been waiting for dual joysticks on a portable since playstation. Ironic, since Sony is the king of hype. Apple advertises games as part of their platform, yet doesn't have one accessory for gaming...and how many accessories for everything else? Screw that bipolar approach.

    "Microsoft announced the Kinect would extend the life of the 360 by 5 years, and PS3 launched with the intention of a 10 year life span. "

    This is just a misnomer for an era of 32x hardware to thrive in place of new consoles. It's killed console gaming for me. 30fps is a relic. It was mildly entertaining when, year after year, gamers defended it in light of shiny graphics. Now it's just embarassing.

    Every now and then I rent a console game and end up setting it aside before beating it; because a nine foot screen and 30fps interactive media with a ton of screen tear does NOT mix well unless you include vomit and/or motion sickness. Then it's chunky goodness to the last dry heave.





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly babies
  • ugly babies faces. ugly babies



  • ro2nie
    Jul 18, 10:55 AM
    Apple don't want to be left out of this online movie thing. They tried to convince the studios, but they couldnt, so I think they have no choice but to make it a rental service before it's too late





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly babies
  • ugly babies faces. ugly babies



  • haysoos123
    Apr 13, 02:07 AM
    +1 here. Every time I've tried to use iMovie for a "quick" edit it always ends in disasters like this. In my case, I was trying to move some music around and time my edits with the music. It was really infuriating trying to do this in iMovie compared to how fast I could have done it in FCP. I guess we'll have wait till Apple posts more info or we get it in our hands to really tell if it can be run like the current FCP.

    True, but why try to use iMovie for a quick edit in the first place? It's not really made for you, and its basic workflow is certainly not made for you. You should use what you can use, even for your home movies. Just because FCP is more advanced doesn't mean you can't also use it for very simple things.

    Count me as excited for this release. As far as I know, they haven't said they would remove key features, but these updates to 64-bit and core usage enhancements have been overdue. For all you guys claiming it's "not pro" ... have you used it? How do you know that from these few details?

    We don't know anything about the Suite offerings, so any bitching on that front is premature. I hope they keep Color and make a great update to Motion. The smoother color controls inside FCP will be a boon for basic things... like you need it to look presentable for cut reviews. Color is great to have around for the integrated post houses and for indies, but we have to remember that FCP is an editing program first and foremost. I will continue to take my bigger projects in for color timing on daVincis with great colorists. But for my lower-budget stuff where that's not in the cards, I hope they throw us a bone.





    ugly babies faces. His face
  • His face



  • hdsalinas
    Sep 1, 12:38 PM
    My Guess:

    iMac 17" - 1299
    1.83 GHz
    512MB RAM
    160 SATA
    8x DL
    ATI x1600 - 128

    iMac 20" - 1699
    2.0 GHz upgradable to 2.16
    512MB RAM
    250 SATA
    8x DL
    ATI x1600 128 upgradable to 256 (As is already)

    iMac 23": 1900 x 1200 - 1999
    2.16 GHz upgradable to 2.33
    1 GB Standard
    250 SATA upgradable to 500 (as 17" and 20" is)
    8x DL
    ATI x1600 256
    FW 800
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I didn't say upgradable on 17" and 20" hard drives because we already know that.

    In a dream world I'd say the 23" vCard would go to the x1800 or something


    I think that your predection is very realistic. I would think that if they do introduced this model they would at least drop $100 off the price of the current models

    Now with those specs, the imac 23 should be called the "Imac Pro"





    ugly babies faces. Credit: Some Ugly Baby
  • Credit: Some Ugly Baby



  • mrkramer
    Jan 13, 01:52 AM
    this is crap,

    no one in their right mind would make something with 0 ports, you have to at a bare minimum have an audio out.

    I agree that it probably won't have no ports, I think it will at least have 1 USB and 1 Firewire, but other than that everything could be done wirelessly, and if Apple wants to make the notebook thinner than the ports are then they may use their patent for collapsible ports that they made a while back.





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly babies
  • ugly babies faces. ugly babies



  • BenRoethig
    Aug 31, 03:23 PM
    Ahh crippling like using inferior Gpu's like in ProMac & Mini? Both GMA950 & 7300 are bottom tier.


    The 7300GT is a lot better than the name implies. It's more like a 7600 light than a regular 7300. Specs are significantly better for this card than the Radeon x1600 the iMacs use.

    Are the Yonah chips being phased out now that Merom is coming on line?

    I would think the same fab would produce the Merom chips...

    Yes. Any yonahs around would probably be from existing stock. It's a direct replacement.





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly babies
  • ugly babies faces. ugly babies



  • iJohnHenry
    Mar 19, 06:33 PM
    I was under the impression he was referring to the 'Lybia' in the thread title.

    Perhaps, but being Canadian, we are always willing to accept blame for our alleged transgressions. :o





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces
  • ugly babies faces



  • milo
    Sep 6, 08:47 AM
    I'm mixed to disappointed on this one.

    The solo to duo upgrade on the low end is nice, but I would rather have seen a price drop.

    On the high end, that's barely an upgrade at all. Before, the high end model was way more appealing, after the upgrade the high end model is really unappealing compared with the macbook and the iMac.





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. ugly babies
  • ugly babies faces. ugly babies



  • ErikGrim
    Mar 30, 08:54 PM
    Is there a DMG or is the App Store / Redemption Code the only way to update? What about offline computers?





    ugly babies faces. ugly babies faces. grant6923
  • ugly babies faces. grant6923



  • takao
    Feb 24, 06:34 PM
    The Koreans have been improving a great deal since they built my borther's 1998 Hyundai Accent (which I someday hope to convert into a rally car when it's served it's on-road purpose). I would say that many of the lates models from Korea equal or exceed the Japanese in quality.

    true i think the mentioned Kia Cee'd is the prime example of a great korean car ... the problem though is that with it the price advantage also vanished ;)
    and i nretroperspective the name change from Dewoo to Chevrolet really helped GM a lot, sales really have been picking on ... relativly

    regarding japanese cars they somehow again managed to hit 2 homeruns in the stupid name department
    the Mitsubishi iMiEV which in german is spoken out (translated) "iStink"
    and the suzuki Kizashi which in austrian dialekt german sounds pretty close to " kiss...'lower backside' "


    As for the Germans, I am a fan of many German cars and they have earned their reputation, but not all of their cars are great. I remember looking over the C-Class hatchback a few years ago and aside from the RWD and the badge it was inferior to a Golf IMO, and quite a bit more money. Same goes for the M-Class, or the BMW 318 and Z3. I think people often assume that the German cars are benchmarks, but not all of them are.

    true that .. regarding german benchmark cars i would mention the Golf TDI, the Mercedes E250 Blu Efficiency CDI, the BMW M3 .. in their markets they are simply the best there is for different reasons:
    the Golf TDI is defining a whole vehicle class for most of europe: "Golf Klasse", every new vehicle roughly the same size and hatchback layout gets compared to it
    the E250 BE CDI: showing that a fuel saving vehicle doesn't need to be hideous and still can be a big saloon car driving from Barcelona to Stuttgart on a single tank
    the M3: the sporty 4 door saloon car benchmark





    ugly babies faces. grows into his face,
  • grows into his face,



  • jmann
    Apr 10, 12:21 AM
    I've tried to drive a stickshift when I was test driving a car. It was interesting. I did okay at it. I've never driven it full time though.





    Peterkro
    Mar 21, 05:50 PM
    Oh dear this is getting serious the French have called up the philosophers including Bernard-Henri Levy.:eek:

    In case you don't think Daffy is targeting civilians:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfydO-Z-D0M





    gkhaldi
    Oct 23, 06:53 AM
    If it can't support 4gigs of ram, it ain't worth the wait for me.:mad:





    DeSnousa
    Apr 14, 05:51 PM
    So I should put the -bigadv into my i7, it's not a great i7 I think its at 1.66ghz and in a laptop. Should I risk it? How can I maximise the PPD from my i7 as its only doing like 1-2k a day I think.





    DNAppleGold
    Apr 2, 08:48 PM
    from someone who hates the new Iphone (a smug listing of features that most top smartphones have, I love this





    OdduWon
    Nov 28, 11:54 AM
    I disagree, take the price of a mini, add a good 17" monitor (4:3 (but not a super cheap one)) then compare the price to the 17" iMac. Not much difference and the iMac has better everything.

    true ,but you could get dual monitors slightly cheaper... oh wait no graphics card, yeah what is up with the mini? it should be the coolest piece of hardware, but it has gotten no love. wheres all the love ?:p



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar