Selasa, 31 Mei 2011

ugly man in world

ugly man in world. Most ugly fish + nice man
  • Most ugly fish + nice man



  • theITGuy
    Nov 29, 10:12 AM
    Anyone playing the Barebones playlists? I love 'em...

    -J.





    ugly man in world. 01 Introad 2 Ugly
  • 01 Introad 2 Ugly



  • bassfingers
    Apr 23, 01:17 PM
    Right. We should leave that to corporations.

    It's funny that unions are doing exactly what people are afraid corporations are doing.

    But what's even funnier, is that all the while, the unions bring us down. They ruin education, give millions of dollars to crappy candidates that are just going to repay them later by pushing crappy legislation that helps out the unions.

    They do little-to-no good for anyone, and are some of the strongest and most corrupt political machines in existence. But people are afraid of big businesses?

    grow up, and don't ask for more than you earn. It's your job to earn your money. It's not the governments job to baby you the whole way there, and its pitiful to rely on a union to make sure you get overpaid and have job security no matter how bad you are at your job





    ugly man in world. In this scene, the man is
  • In this scene, the man is



  • GeekLawyer
    May 3, 10:52 PM
    When I hear “It’s just getting started,” that signals to me there is more to come. Which implies that patience will be rewarded. Which further implies to wait for future models....I get your meaning. I hear "it's just getting started" like the Macintosh was just getting started in the mid-80s. I see it a little more expansively than any one model. It's about the next epoch in information technology getting underway.





    ugly man in world. and this kurdish man has again
  • and this kurdish man has again



  • Yakuza
    Apr 16, 07:34 AM
    This shell may be fake, in terms of design I also think it looks a bit archaic, "squared", but looking back at this last iMac and the iPad (with the aluminum back cover) i guess that's the way Apple will go with the next iphone.

    It'll look DAMN sexy :D


    Way to go Malim :). Can it be a first prototype?



    more...


    ugly man in world. Ugliest man in the world ugoto
  • Ugliest man in the world ugoto



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 18, 07:40 AM
    Wow, so the finder is finally giving us, what other OS' had for years. I wonder what the fanboys will say now, after defending this lack of a feature for years.

    I suspect along the lines that apple innovates again and creates a brand new feature :p

    I don't know which iPhone users were you talking about.

    Everyone wanted multi-tasking; there are hypocrites, but can't believe any body touting that multi-tasking is bad or could be bad.





    ugly man in world. Sometimes I really push ugly
  • Sometimes I really push ugly



  • BC2009
    Dec 13, 10:25 AM
    How could Apple keep production of an LTE iPhone so completely quiet when a release is pending in two weeks? We would have heard something in the supply chain before this.

    This supposed source also says that Apple may be financing some of the carrier's LTE buildouts -- if Apple were doing that they would be asking for exclusive use of those LTE networks for a period. It would also set a terrible precedent.

    Also, I don't imagine that AT&T & Apple signed a contract that had exclusivity expiring on December 26, 2010. It would make far more sense for a contract to be written that extends through the end of though some have even speculated it extends through 2012 (heaven help us and Apple if that's the case).

    Nothing in this article from MacDailyNews seems close to the truth.

    EDIT: In other news, rumor has it that Apple and NASA are launching a series of iPhone satellites on December 26th that will support the iPhone-SAT which will have 100MBps speeds with worldwide coverage using a series of Apple-owned satellites and taking the carrier completely out of the equation. There will be no more carrier exclusivity, because there will be no carrier. Apple will sell the phone for $700 unlocked with no monthly service charge, but will require you purchase an annual subscription to MobileMe for $99 for service.



    more...


    ugly man in world. Man of Steel,
  • Man of Steel,



  • puuukeey
    Jan 9, 02:02 PM
    Oh the irony. I sit and refresh this idiotic mac fanatic fan site 4 times a day so I can see what apple is going to release. Then I insist on being the last guy on the planet to know when they actually do something.

    SHOOT ME





    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. ugly man in
  • ugly man in world. ugly man in



  • Popeye206
    Apr 16, 05:59 PM
    Apple has by far the most restrictive ecosystem. You can't even load applications that are not approved by Apple.

    Ahhhh.... dude... the only Apps that don't really get approved are ones that do things that can cause security risks or just plain trying to steal your information.

    Yeah, I know... there are also Apps that break the rules and get axed, but for the most part, my first point is true. Any legitimate application can get approved.

    If you keep up with Android apps, security is one of the their problems. Open? Yes... risky? Yes.



    more...


    ugly man in world. The Guinness Book of World
  • The Guinness Book of World



  • BForstall
    Mar 17, 02:30 AM
    by OP D****n, coming here to tell us all that he stole something from Best Buy.

    Troll Harder, D****n...

    I have half a mind to send a copy of this thread and your deets to the Best Buy you thieved from.

    thread archived just in case I decide to.

    btw: someone commented that kid would have his pay docked..no he won't. It's illegal to do that in the U.S.

    edit: ** out your name so I can't be accused of revealing your personal info in a forum here.






    :rolleyes: Good luck getting anywhere with that.





    ugly man in world. First man in the world able to
  • First man in the world able to



  • maclaptop
    Apr 29, 02:50 PM
    SUPER iMACHINE - ULTRA TRANSFORMER


    Upon closer inspection I noticed my new MBP has a removable display.

    Unlocked by Lion it doubles as an Ipad.

    Shrink it in the microwave & it's an iPhone!

    I just knew there was a reason to marry iOS & OS X.

    Apple is so damn brilliant.

    Be the envy of every kid on your block !



    more...


    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. ugly man in
  • ugly man in world. ugly man in



  • dethmaShine
    Apr 13, 06:13 AM
    My experience has been the exact opposite with the Mac, whether its trying to access a share on one of my other computers (my wife uses a PC) or accessing network resources on my work's network.

    When in windows 7 it "just worked" I had no need to mess with eth0, drivers or any manually set up a network. I was able to connect to the resource and use it. Also it was much faster.


    It has always been the same with the mac. Just go to the finder and look for shared computers.
    OR
    Taskbar: 'Go To Server/Computer'
    OR
    ssh/ftp > prostuff-not required


    I had issues with OSX, that I was unable to access any shared files from my wife's computer. Accessing my work stuff was a bit easier but was SLOW, painfully slow. I pull up a folder with a couple hundred files, and I can easily sit there for well over 10 minutes while OSX does it thing. Windows, just a couple of minutes.


    Report bugs. Are you comparing b/w OSX <-> Windows and Windows <-> Windows?


    Networking is where windows has a clear advantage of OSX, in part because many (most?) enterprise networks are windows based, at least from my experience.


    You are confusing stuff.


    Given the design of windows, there's zero chance of that, it would require a complete rewrite and the folks at MS really don't see the design of windows being flawed. Especially since they see the marketshare being what it is - kind of like why fix it if it isn't broke mentality.

    Fair enough.





    ugly man in world. How about the world#39;s ugliest.
  • How about the world#39;s ugliest.



  • bitfactory
    Aug 9, 01:10 PM
    I'm apple worst nightmare.

    [sic]

    I'll give you one of those words.



    more...


    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. ugly man in
  • ugly man in world. ugly man in



  • AppliedVisual
    Oct 17, 04:36 PM
    Few bucks!!! The cheapest HD-DVD player the Toshiba HD-A1 is now under $400. I have seen the XA1 for under $600 now. The cheapest BD player is $999 and don't even bring up the PS3!! People are not going in droves to buy a PS3 just to play their BD-ROM media. Also, it will not even be available for a while.

    PS3 = November 24. But if you're not already on a waiting list (and near the front) don't count on getting yours before Christmas.

    The only difference between the Toshiba A1 and XA1 is that the XA1 has a different front bezel and a serial control interface. There is no difference in audio, video or other capabilities. Don't buy the XA1 unless you're using an AMX, Crestron, Zantec or similar control system that uses a serial control.

    That being said, I saw the RCA version of the A1 at my Local Sam's Club last week for $329.99.

    OTOH, when considering the next generation HD-DVD players and announced prices in comparison with BluRay and the curious fact that all HD-DVD features thus far average $8 more from most retailers vs. Blu-Ray, the cost of the two formats is identical to a consumer who picks up a library of about 40 or more films. At current pricing, buying a $1K BluRay player and 100 movies (oh, wait there aren't 100 movies yet), would be cheaper than a $400 HD-DVD player and 100 movies (also not that many yet). So it's too early to tell what's going to happen....

    IMO, I wouldn't buy the Samsung BP1000 player anyway. It's a complete turd and there's a lot more wrong with it than the image softening effect going on in the scaler. IMO, I doubt any firmware update is going to fix this player and Samsung is going to try and patch it as best as they can and move on as quietly as possible.

    Also the PS3 will be to BluRay what the PS2 was to DVD... It will just be a capable player and nothing more. You won't get the advanced audio capabilities of the BDP-S1 player or the same color depth and image processing hardware. The PS3 uses a software-based player, which does leave some room for future upgrades though. While I have not seen a PS3 in action, I've been two several Sony demonstrations of the BDP-S1 and several of their reps have said that the PS3 will be a second-rate player and primarily a game system.. Well, duh.

    Not that it really matters... Current estimages from IGN and others put PS3 pre-order numbers at a staggering 14 million (world-wide). I think that's a gross over-estimate given the PS3's intro price. But even if it's half of that, that pretty much ensures instant BluRay success overnight. Toshiba has yet to ship 200,000 HD-DVD units.

    And no I don't think the format "war" will end anytime soon... I just don't see either format losing enough ground to actually be pulled from the market.





    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. ugly man in
  • ugly man in world. ugly man in



  • inkswamp
    Oct 3, 04:00 AM
    Ug, I can't believe I just defended a monopoly.

    Bear in mind, there is nothing inherently bad in a company having a monopoly, not even Microsoft. What's bad (and illegal) is when a company in such a position abuses its monopolistic power. I have to remind MS defenders of this fact as many of them don't seem to grasp the nuance here. MS wasn't in trouble for being a monopoly (rightly so--being one is not illegal.) MS was in trouble for abusing that power.

    Speaking of MS defenders, is it my imagination or are there an awful lot of Macrumors newbies on the board now who seem to bash Apple pretty quickly and at every turn? What's that all about?



    more...


    ugly man in world. most ugly man in the world
  • most ugly man in the world



  • balamw
    Oct 6, 10:44 AM
    I noticed some of the same issues you did with the Wiki article, but didn't find a better general one. You? Cody Brocious had a blog post on the iTunes 6 process a while back but it doesn't seem to be available anymore...

    Both the private assymetric key, used to communicate with the server (to obtain the symmetric keys) and all of the symmetric keys, used to decrypt the actual media files, are hidden inside iTunes. Try looking for them on your harddrive, I promise you that you won't find them (unless you are an expert pirate with a few months of your time where you have nothing better to do....)

    My point was exactly that. All the keys for decryption have to be on your PC/Mac/iPod.

    It's the keys used to encrypt the actual media files, which are more closely guarded at Apple. It's much easier to pick the locks on the local system you have under your control than a remote server somewhere... The decryption keys are definitely stored locally since you can play protected files while offline. The one chink in the armor that I see that Jon may be using is that the personalization of the files is done locally, so this step may be exploitable.

    Finding where the keys are on your HDD is the easy part, accessing and using them is the task that takes months... [Simple way to find the location of the keys. Image your HDD. Purchase file from iTunes. Image your HDD compare the two images. The new key(s) (and the file itself) must be in the bits that changed.]

    As someone who does this for a living, can you comment on my read of the hacks that have been released in the later post http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=2917258&postcount=96. It still seems to me that where DRM has been hacked has relied on key retrieval or finding the weak spot in the chain.





    ugly man in world. According to this wise man
  • According to this wise man



  • SactoGuy18
    Mar 24, 09:12 PM
    Congratulations on ten years of MacOS X. :)

    In many ways, by basing it on a variant of BSD Unix that uses the Mach kernel, MacOS X has a very high level of stability that multitasking power that is still hard to match.

    Remember the "Copland" project at Apple back in the middle 1990's to create a true multitasking version of the Mac operating system? I'm glad that when Jobs returned to Apple they decided to put the multitasking Mac operating system on top of the same Mach kernel, just like NeXTStep did.



    more...


    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. most ugly
  • ugly man in world. most ugly



  • SandynJosh
    Mar 28, 05:05 PM
    I voted this negative because Apple won't accept certain apps for doing reasonable things. "dangerous" if done incorrectly, but reasonable.

    Until devs can do all of the low level things they need to, this is a bad move.

    Think about it. If Apple sells an app (via the Mac App Store) that modifies the system, then they need to take that into account when troubleshooting hardware issues, and can't tell you to eliminate the app they sold you.





    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. most ugly
  • ugly man in world. most ugly



  • AhmedFaisal
    Apr 13, 07:40 AM
    Yeah, because you have access to all of the intellegence reports. :rolleyes: You try again...

    The official 9/11 commission report speaks for itself.

    As for the TSA not making air travel any safer you literally have nothing to go on other than making a blind assumption. It is simply another security layer and that in itself will deter some from giving it a try. That being said, if someone wants to kill people bad enough they will and people like you will constantly blame it on others. :rolleyes:

    Linky (http://www.usatoday.com/travel/columnist/mcgee/2008-02-27-state-of-airline-security_N.htm)

    So much about that. Even when you read biased **** like the recent RAND Corp report the findings are astounding. What baffles me even more is their conclusion that international airtravel is the threat and domestic security should be reduced again. Nevermind that the 9/11 flights were all domestic flights and the 9/11 gang would have most likely been caught had they tried this stunt on an international flight with the pre 9/11 security measures of international travel. There is so much misinformation and ******** being propagated in this arena my trust in the competence of anyone involved in this business is absolute zero.





    ugly man in world. ugly man in world. in #39;Iron Man 2#39; World; in #39;Iron Man 2#39; World. dante@sisna.com. Sep 12, 06:54 PM
  • ugly man in world. in #39;Iron Man 2#39; World; in #39;Iron Man 2#39; World. dante@sisna.com. Sep 12, 06:54 PM



  • nimasm
    Jan 15, 02:44 PM
    zimtheinvader you're right: MBA does not compare favourably to other products available. Thinness is a nice quality, and indeed it gives that premium edge to the MBA that other UMPCs lack, but Apple's seeming need to give you a full-featured, full-screen, full-clock speed computer is contrary to the needs of ultraportability. While I don't begrudge the Core 2 processor, nor the ample RAM, I can't say that a 13.3" widescreen is essential. (Indeed, if you're aiming for portability, then the dinosaur 4:3 format offers a greater ratio of screen area to overall dimensions).

    I recently had the opportunity to borrow an Asus Eee PC, and was blown away by the advantages of its form factor. It was solidly built, confidence inspring, yet portable. The MBA makes me worry about potential flimsiness. How will it compared to a Macbook if bashed in the centre of the lid. The Eee PC, while slow and cramped, at least has rigidity

    Moreover, do people really want to pay more for a compromised solution? Compare the Eee PC at �200. Now I don't wish to say that the Eee PC is something Apple should have produced, but in almost every respect it is in the right direction. It's smaller in the correct sense (reducing the greater dimensions first), sturdier, cheaper. Asus have done a fantastic job of this, and I don't doubt that Apple could have done it even better. How about a 10-12" screen, make it thin if you really must, but make it cheap, and drop pretentions of selling people a widescreen video-editing 'supercomputer'?

    With my cursory memory of the MBA's features, I can't think of a single argument other than a need to have the latest thing for the MBA over the top of the range Macbook, a notebook which I subjectively think looks more attractive, too.

    What consumers would go for would be more portability, more affordability, at the expense of screen real estate and ultimate performance. What have given us is equal portability, a lot less affordability, and less performance.





    bboucher790
    May 2, 10:44 AM
    You're tracking us wrong.





    l3lack J4ck
    Nov 23, 10:12 PM
    so guys,

    does anyone think that the discounts will be able to be used in conjunction with educational discounts? if so that'd be great...if not...then i guess you still save an additional 50 bucks? that'd be ok!

    tell me what you think about hte question?





    PygmySurfer
    Oct 29, 01:12 PM
    Already replied to this, so take the time to read the rest of the posts. But to answer once more... I will take my PC to his house install there, mess with it and reformat once i take it home some days later. Like many use the same Windows install for more then one PC.

    This is a way to get around having to get a new copy of osx, because the law alows this where i live. But i'm not completely sure and will try to get more information on this.

    Just wish people would reply and try to help or explain, instead of immediatly trashing me... I'm trying to do the right thing, and if i have to buy th OS then I will. The reason is just to try OS X on a PC and for the sake of the apple experience.

    But hey, know you're all apple fanboys in here so maybe i should just go somewhere where people dont trash you for nothing...

    If you want to "try out" Mac OS X, what's stopping you from trying it out on your friend's computer? If you want to do the right thing, you won't be installing OS X on non-Apple hardware.

    Unless you're a corporation who purchased a volume license, using the same Windows install on multiple machines is illegal too, btw.





    psycoswimmer
    Jan 9, 02:58 PM
    Okay. I don't know when the keynote will update but I'll do what I usually do. Now that I already know the products, I'll go to apple.com and check the site and then watch the keynote later to see them "in action". This is what I usually do, anyway.





    Lepton
    Sep 12, 08:00 AM
    I think part of this announcement has to do with Leopard. There is a phone and/or media center device in our futures, and of course it will be very tightly integrated with OSX. Part of why OSX new features are top secret is because it is intimately involved with what will be announced here. With this product out of the bag, they can finally spill some stuff they've been holding back about Leopard. I'd expect a new Leopard seed out soon.

    Note Leopard hasn't been sent to the general seeding developer community yet? They must have a build in the wings.

    Note not a word on changes in Leopard Front Row, iTunes, Finder? These things are in the wings.

    At showtime, things in the wings come out on stage.



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar